In other blog posts I have strongly lamented the
fact, and the law, that we have used race/ethnicity/skin colour as the central
criteria to redress disadvantage in our transformational model. Under a raft of
laws and protocols our Affirmative Action model is predicated on the
proposition that, before you can receive assistance to redress apartheid
induced disadvantage, you must be Black or accept
the label “Black”. Also see ......
I have made the point that we now have a nation
that is obsessed and preoccupied, in its psyche, with racial/ethnic difference,
with dastardly consequences looming, particularly for our children in their
formative years. A reality check is to advert to America, a country we just
love to pooh pooh and posture against. The comparison is that, in South Africa,
it is absolutely inconceivable that any "non-black" could
be considered for presidency, for a nano second. The Whites in the
USA have installed a Coloured president, referred to as "black" in
terms of a social construct -- NOT LAW.
I even circulated a New Years Appeal to all opinion makers in South
Africa. This was, like the problem itself, simply ignored without
acknowledgement.
Regrettably my stance has now been spectacularly vindicated. It has emerged
that Jimmy Manyi, Chief government spokesman, made a statement on 9 March 2010
that – it is “very important for Coloured people to understand
that there was an over concentration of them in the Western
Cape” … and that “they should stop this over –concentration
situation as they are in an oversupply situation” where they are and
should move out to other Provinces. He finishes by stating the Employment
Equity Act is a very good Act. See
youtube…
This statement could not be more racist on
a very obvious test. Each Province has an ethnic group that is in the majority,
such as the Zulus in Kwa Zulu, Natal and the Xhosa in the Eastern Cape. However
it is only the Coloured majority in the Western Cape that is seen as
a bad problem, so bad as to negate/subvert socio-economic
transformation.
A whole people, who have been in South Africa from
the beginning, are classified as a problem for South African society
- simply on account of their ethnicity.
There is no conceptual difference in this stance and that taken by the
3rd Reich against the Jews … and that led to the Holocaust. In both cases
the ethnicity of the people is the objection. In both
cases that ethnicity is classified as inimical to national
interest. The only difference is that Hitler exterminated the Jews.
Manyi insists that the Coloureds must migrate. Did Manyi dream this
up as Idi Amin did in August 1972? Given a choice, would he resort to the same
"solution" as Amin? Well, it is almost the same. Amin's solution was
an expulsion of Indians from Uganda. Manyi's
solution is "migration" of Coloured folk.
To see people as a problem for the national
interest, as if they are plague carrying vermin, is the worst form of racism.
Typically, non other than Zwelinzima Vavi of COSATU, and many others have
confirmed this obvious fact. See
Manyi is our government spokesperson. Our
government is the guarantor of the Constitution, that includes a Bill Of
Rights, ensuring equality before the law. He has torn this up by making it
clear that Coloureds are not equal before the law. They must be
discriminated against. Unlike Zulus of Xhosa, and other dominant groups in
other provinces, their ethnicity is a bad problem for national interest.
It gets worse. One month after this vile attack on Coloureds, Manyi had
this to say about Indians whilst addressing the Durban Chamber of Commerce
"Indians, we should be having only 3%
[of positions on management]. They are sitting at 5.9. I call it the power of
bargaining. Indians have bargained their way to the top." This
was said during the year that the country was supposedly celebrating 150 years
of Indians having arrived in South Africa. See …
It gets very much worse. Instead of taking action against Manyi,
and/or his statements, Government took action in support by
drafting an Employment Equity Amendment Bill that will
have the effect of forcing migration of Coloureds out of the Western Cape as an
estimated +- million of them will become unemployed.
From this it is clear that Manyi was expressing the
accepted view of a government “think tank” or “brains trust,” charged with
responsibility to come up with a solution to the “Coloured
problem”. The solution is the Bill.
Although government is now backtracking on the Bill, on account of widespread
criticism by Unions in particular, this does not remove the truth of the whole
saga. Coloureds were officially seen as a problem, purely on account of
their ethnicity. Government decided that action needed to be taken. A Bill was
drawn up and signed off by the whole of Cabinet, including Trevor Manuel who
ironically now publicly labels only Manyi as a racist,
but significantly includes the charge that – “I have a sense that your
racism has infiltrated the highest echelons of government.”
Idi Amin expelled the Indians. Our government
proposed to force Coloured migration!
The Democratic Alliance could not be more right.
If there is any doubt that government is fully complicit is this racism, it is
completely removed by the fact that Manyi is still in his job, despite
widespread calls for his removal.
There can be very little doubt that the "anti Coloured" stance
is also informed by the fact that they have voted the DA into power in the
Western Cape. This exercise of a basic right to choose one's leaders is seen as
offensive, unpalatable, anathema in our young democracy. It is so,
even though so many gave their lives in order to ensure we now have that sacred
right. The situation could not be more vomitus!
The Bill is, in effect, a form of
pernicious social engineering to ensure that the Coloured vote is
diluted to the extent that they become a racial minority in a province that
they have been the majority in from day one.
At the time of independence, led by Nelson
Rolihlahla Mandela, South Africa straddled the whole world as a moral giant and
example to mankind. Egged on by wonderful voices like
Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Dr Mamphela Aletta Ramphele, it stood to
lead the world in a new social justice culture of ubuntu.
Ubuntu was discarded and replaced by a rapacious culture
of enrichment by a new elite, trading entirely on the
"Black" label. The richer have gotten richer. The poorer
have gotten poorer.
What is especially pernicious about
all this is that Manyi and government, in the Bill, have linked the
Coloured and Indian issue to the extremely emotive issue of jobs. The
clear message is that these ethnic groups are prejudicing the
disadvantaged Black majority on this score. The historical analogy is when
Mugabe linked the emotive land issue to Whites in
Zimbabwe. Despite equality under the constitution of Zimbabwe, the
Whites were then divested of all rights and victimized at the whim of
anybody professing to be serving Black interests.
Many Coloureds and Indians imagined that accepting the "Black" label
would provide equality. We should no longer be confused. Coloureds and Indians
are not Black and should never have accepted the label as a
precondition to benefiting under Affirmative Action and Employment
Equity laws and protocols. They are not accepted as either
"Black" or as equal. They are seen as a problem, a very
big problem.
That is the inconvenient truth that
is now before our eyes for the whole world to see. We are all
Africans. We should be proud Africans. That much is also clear from Thabo
Mbeki's epic prose "I am an African". The richness of our
ethnic diversity is admitted. We cannot be coerced to deny it. We don't have to
be Black to be proud and equal among equals.
As a nation, we
should have insisted that Lady Justice remain blindfolded.
Our President needs to urgently show leadership, faced with this grossest
violation of human rights and subversion of our Constitution. He
knows all too well what it is like to be "categorized" and
victimized. Ordinary branch members of the ANC removed Thabo Mbeki, and
chose him, because they saw him as epitomizing victimhood. He carries a brief
for all underdogs. He made a solemn promise that he would stand up for those
who are most vulnerable and would guarantee accountability.
If Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma sees
himself as the President of all South Africans the least
he will do is to fire Jimmy Manyi ...immediately.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm for truth, no matter who tells it.
I'm for justice,
no matter who it's for or against.
Malcolm X
"To Whites other Whites were regarded as "us", Black folk were
regarded as "them" and Coloured folk as "the other”.
It was a huge management problem for the colonial
government, and its dominant White society, given the incredible racial
diversity and colouring of my people. It remains so to-day despite
revolutionary changes in the region.
Since Coloured people are neither truly white, brown nor black, a government
obsessed with colour as a basic criterion in the treatment of human beings, is
tripped up and confused about what to do. So it resorts to makeshift and
unprincipled solutions like artificially defining all "non-white"
people as Black. The consequences for us Coloured people are organically
induced challenges, ever present, hardly acknowledged; in a minefield of
obfuscation". From the book - "The Other - without fear, favour or prejudice" published by Lulu.com. 2010.
Regrettably my stance has now been spectacularly vindicated. It has emerged that Jimmy Manyi, Chief government spokesman, made a statement on 9 March 2010 that – it is “very important for Coloured people to understand that there was an over concentration of them in the Western Cape” … and that “they should stop this over –concentration situation as they are in an oversupply situation” where they are and should move out to other Provinces. He finishes by stating the Employment Equity Act is a very good Act. See youtube…
There is no conceptual difference in this stance and that taken by the 3rd Reich against the Jews … and that led to the Holocaust. In both cases the ethnicity of the people is the objection. In both cases that ethnicity is classified as inimical to national interest. The only difference is that Hitler exterminated the Jews. Manyi insists that the Coloureds must migrate. Did Manyi dream this up as Idi Amin did in August 1972? Given a choice, would he resort to the same "solution" as Amin? Well, it is almost the same. Amin's solution was an expulsion of Indians from Uganda. Manyi's solution is "migration" of Coloured folk.
It gets worse. One month after this vile attack on Coloureds, Manyi had this to say about Indians whilst addressing the Durban Chamber of Commerce
It gets very much worse. Instead of taking action against Manyi, and/or his statements, Government took action in support by drafting an Employment Equity Amendment Bill that will have the effect of forcing migration of Coloureds out of the Western Cape as an estimated +- million of them will become unemployed.
Although government is now backtracking on the Bill, on account of widespread criticism by Unions in particular, this does not remove the truth of the whole saga. Coloureds were officially seen as a problem, purely on account of their ethnicity. Government decided that action needed to be taken. A Bill was drawn up and signed off by the whole of Cabinet, including Trevor Manuel who ironically now publicly labels only Manyi as a racist, but significantly includes the charge that – “I have a sense that your racism has infiltrated the highest echelons of government.”
There can be very little doubt that the "anti Coloured" stance is also informed by the fact that they have voted the DA into power in the Western Cape. This exercise of a basic right to choose one's leaders is seen as offensive, unpalatable, anathema in our young democracy. It is so, even though so many gave their lives in order to ensure we now have that sacred right. The situation could not be more vomitus!
Many Coloureds and Indians imagined that accepting the "Black" label would provide equality. We should no longer be confused. Coloureds and Indians are not Black and should never have accepted the label as a precondition to benefiting under Affirmative Action and Employment Equity laws and protocols. They are not accepted as either "Black" or as equal. They are seen as a problem, a very big problem.
Since Coloured people are neither truly white, brown nor black, a government obsessed with colour as a basic criterion in the treatment of human beings, is tripped up and confused about what to do. So it resorts to makeshift and unprincipled solutions like artificially defining all "non-white" people as Black. The consequences for us Coloured people are organically induced challenges, ever present, hardly acknowledged; in a minefield of obfuscation". From the book - "The Other - without fear, favour or prejudice" published by Lulu.com. 2010.
4 comments:
On 3 July 2010 the German and Argentinean teams were made to hold up a banner stating "Say No To Racism" before their quarter final clash in the FIFA World cup in South Africa. How very, very ironic.
Despite widespread calls for Jimmy Manyi to be fired, as at 15 March 2011 government, had taken no action.
Secretary General of the ANC, Gwede Mantashe, lashed out at the media and argued that no one had brought Manyi's competence into question. He was dubbed "mampara of the week" by the Sunday Times I suppose for also missing the point that Manyi's incompetence, as revealed by his statement, racism aside, was blindingly obvious.
test
I find it most repugnant that this commentator dare to talk about 'independance' and Mandela in the same breath. South Africa like it or not obtained independance in 1910 that is something the new history fairy tailers cannot rewrite
Really Anonymous! What is really repugnant is that 'independent' blacks require legislation in the form of Affirmative Action to compete with other men. It's a bit like tying on of your opponent's hand behind his back so as to have a fair chance of beating him. Like it or not that is demeaning and that's how history will always see it.
Post a Comment