So so-called "Backs" cannot be racist??

You are kidding . Right?
Our Black brethren never cease to lament, condemn and cry about the colonialists.
They even mounted an attack on the statue of Cecil John Rhodes and scored a massive victory using the hitherto unknown weapons of human excrement and urine.

I have lived in 4 countries in this region. SA Blacks proved to be the most racist and xenophobic of all ethnic groups.
Namibia and Botswana were havens of brotherly love, respect and acceptance of difference.<3

The problem is that SA has an exact mirror image of the apartheid model as its reform model, with only the colour coding reversed. Ten (10) years ago I lamented this "racial" model and predicted that it would psychologically proposition our Black brethren into being racist. I was right !!! 100% right !!!!

A glaring example is that far more humans were killed and brutalized in the so-called "xeno violence" than were killed and brutalized at Sharpeville by Whites.
The latter is rightly commemorated as having been a racist pogrom but the Xeno pogrom is treated as a non-event because it was done by Backs.
This is 100% racist.

So now we have Africans being treated as vermin, in a saga involving drivers, because the colonial border makes them "foreigners" ...
and, just like the colonialists our Black brethren brutalize them in the cause of advantage seeking ...
but we say that the colonialists were mindless, heartless, bigoted racists ...
but excuse ourselves ... because of a border created by those very same terrible colonialists??????🤢🤢😡😡 ...
and we have a President who told D J Trump that there were no killings of Whites on farms and smallholdings???

To this we can add that Coloured folk are by law and policy "politically" defined as "Black". Then Chief government Spokesmen gave the lie to the climate of racist hypocrisy when he insisted that Coloured folk should get the hell out of the Western Cape in which they are the majority and almost sole descendants of the original Khoisan inhabitants.