There is no
disagreement that South Africa is a very sick nation. Zwelenzima Vavi, of
COSATU, has just opined that we have no less than 20 demonstrations a day now, about failed delivery of services. We all know about the crime statistics and
that over two (2) million households are now headed by a child … just for
starters. It is now nearly two years since Vavi correctly observed that a
situation has been reached where the new elite are “spitting in the faces of the poor”. Now we have violent riots almost daily and the nation has experienced the tragedy of Marikana.
What we simply do not agree on is the reason(s). The ANC support camp is always vociferous in
blaming everyone and everything else “Whites,
colonialism, imperialism …” except our ANC government. Black political
commentators, and the media, are more objective, in correctly ascribing responsibility
to government. However this is always done “gingerly” and with good dollops of
political correctness. White commentators, like Prof Pierre de Vos, are mostly even more tactful.
As a people we are
just not identifying, admitting and addressing the fundamental drivers of why
we are a very sick society. On Redi Tlhabi’s 702 talk show, on the morning of 4 July 2012, psychologist and struggle stalwart, Dr Saths Cooper, very eloquently said as much
labeling, South Africa as a very “abnormal” society. Society we are; nation we are
not. Why is this so? Why are we not a nation?
Like everything else,
whether it be a house, a dam, a bridge, a road or a society, it must start with
the “fundamentals”. These are always critical. So let us confront the
main fundamental with brutal candour ... for the first time I dare say.
On day one of our new
democracy, in 1994, the dominant majority decided to define its members, not as
human beings, but as a colour; the colour “black”. It did this, despite
the fact that this “label" came with really terrible credentials. It is no more,
no less a racist social construct conceived in the cause of oppression. It was
conceived and nurtured in the old slave owning, plantation owner dominated Deep South USA, to lump everyone, not of pure Caucasian genes (Negroid, Hispanic, mulatto,
quadroons, octoroons .. etc), into one grouping. The infamous JimCrowe “one drop” rule was a natural by-product.
Of course the label
“black” had great utility during the Civil Rights era. Since all non-whites
were rejected by the dominant White group, unity of purpose to rebut racism was
unavoidable. However such utility was simply not indicated once
liberation was won in 1994. It has little relevance in the USA to-day,
where a whole people have voted in a colour blind way to install a man, Barrack Obama, to the
most powerful position in the World, purely on merit!
That people should be
seen and treated as humans, and NOT as colours, was long overdue in South
Africa. It was also at the heart of the struggle against apartheid, because
treating human beings as colours was at the heart of the that culture. However,
instead of dumping the apartheid culture, and this racist social construct, we
adopted it, embraced it and embedded it in our transformational model.
So we posted this as
central to Affirmative Action, and we gave our socio-economic empowerment model
the label “black”, i.e. Black Economic Empowerment. In the result we can now
post this plaque in the very heart of South Africa- “On this
farm, as regards jobs and contracts, a Black MUST be favoured; a White MUST be
discriminated against; a Coloured/Indian/Chinese MUST be discriminated against
unless defined/accepted as Black”.
In this model the
black majority has become “us”. The White minority has become “them”. The rest
have become “the other”. After 18 years we do not have a nation. We have
groupings of people whose psyche is pre-occupied with difference, and the
notion “Black good, White bad, Coloured/Asian not too bad/good”. It
is like a growing cancer, eating away at the very fabric of society.
Instead of making
“subsisting disadvantage” the criterion, in a drive towards social
justice, NOT so called "social cohesion", we made the colour “black” the criterion, in a drive towards
“transformation”. Instead of saying that “a person who is still
disadvantaged on account of apartheid will be affirmed/empowered" we
say that advantage MUST accrue to even a multibillionaire, if he/she is black,
and disadvantage MUST accrue to a White, even if he/she is a pauper, had
nothing to do with apartheid, and might even have opposed it. The same
disadvantage MUST accrue to a Coloured or Asian person if he/she rejects the
label “black”. This is mind boggling vomitus stuff! We know this. But we are silent.
Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) was gratefully
accepted, by a new Black connected elite, as a wonderfully packaged gift from the same sector that propped up apartheid. The colour “black” became a
commodity/currency to be traded in for fabulous personal gain. BEE, in effect, stands for "black economic enrichment"! It has nothing to do with "empowerment".
We have a plethora of entities that have labeled themselves as “black”, e.g, Black Management Forum, Black Lawyers Association … etc. We have companies that specialize in certifying the level of your “blackness” under BEE accreditation. This is ludicrous in the extreme. George Orwell must be wincing in his grave. We know this. But we say nothing.
We have a plethora of entities that have labeled themselves as “black”, e.g, Black Management Forum, Black Lawyers Association … etc. We have companies that specialize in certifying the level of your “blackness” under BEE accreditation. This is ludicrous in the extreme. George Orwell must be wincing in his grave. We know this. But we say nothing.
Obviously evil begets
evil. So it is not at all surprising that it has not worked … not at all. That
is why we are still a very sick society, 18 years after liberation was
supposedly won, at terrible cost and human sacrifice. Black fat cats voraciously exploited BEE and joined their big business sponsors ... leaving millions still stuck in apartheid poverty. The gap between rich and poor widened. SA achieved the shameful distinction of becoming the most unequal society in the world.
Given the fatally
flawed "transformational" model, its objective too was fatally flawed. That is why we have no
mention of social justice in the national discourse. If social injustice was
the evil of apartheid, social justice is the reversal. A government that is
obsessed with race/colour/ethnicity is divested from even starting to
understand that the real objective is social justice. We don’t know that this
is the objective. We don’t know it because we are stuck in an apartheid
mentality. We are stuck there because we choose to deny the obvious. That is why we are dabbling in curious concepts like "social cohesion" and economic freedom". A thoroughly cowed populace refuses to see what is staring it in the face.
It was Joe Slovo who
stated that “the effectiveness of freedom vanishes when ‘freedom’
becomes a special privilege” , i.e., BEE. But you cannot
understand that people are not free if they are defined as a colour. You cannot
understand that social justice is “colour blind”. When you define human beings
as colour you are doing it for a perverse vindictive motive, not justice. When you attach
rights and privileges to that colour you are being racist. We all know this.
For God’s sake, we should, as victims of apartheid! But we are silent.
We are in a state of
denial, massive wholesale denial. That is why social justice is not within our
understanding. It is not an objective. It is not in our discourse. We divested
ourselves of this level of understanding on day one.
There are consequences
for this lack of understanding of social justice. We can name a few.
- It is why we are “comfortable” with our President taking as many wives as he likes, even though this is certain proof that women are still unequal.
- It is why we all gleefully celebrated the 2010 World Cup, even though the country could not afford it and it meant squandering scarce resources needed for our poor and homeless.
- It is why not one person will even suggest that the deaths of some 300,000 victims of HIV/AIDs, on account of the willful, arrogant, purposeful denial of drugs, was a crime against humanity. To suggest this of such an important member of the “Black” majority is taboo.
- It is why so many are happy at the singing of the song “Dubula ibhunu” that calls for man to kill man.
- It is why we acquiesce in the fact that a woman or child is raped every 20 seconds. It is why we connive and collude at the miles and miles of shacks and shanty towns in which human beings live like rats.
- It is why the rights of the Khoi San, as the original inhabitants of the region, are not even mooted.
- It is why the deaths of 62 people on account of xenophobic violence has no official acknowledgement.
- It is why the police have become militarized .. and as result have just shot over 100 protesters out of hand, with 44 dead, in the tragedy of Marikana.
- It is why the ruling party locked horns over “economic freedom” instead of social justice.
- It is why the wise counsel of Dr Mamphela Ramphele that we need to “walk together” has been ignored with seeming contempt.
- It is why we have had a conference, named “a social cohesion summit”, about the future of SA and no mention was made of social justice in the pitch or discourse.
- The President is quoted as saying that “it is time to build an inclusive society”. The statement is irreconcilable with a society that is defined in terms of colours. No one is saying it!
We need to understand
that Lady justice is blindfolded for very good reason. She was not always so.
Mankind took centuries to realize that she needed a blindfold. What we have
done in South Africa is to take the blindfold off. We ask her to see
difference. We ask her to make her sacred call on the basis of colour.
It is not justice, It
is madness. We need to stop denying this! The so called “Social Cohesion
Summit” was fatally flawed.
We need to start thinking about President Kenneth Kaunda’s concept of “humanism” liberally spiced with our very own ubuntu.
We need to start thinking about President Kenneth Kaunda’s concept of “humanism” liberally spiced with our very own ubuntu.
And here is the simple truth --- IF THE ABOVE DOES NOT
CHANGE, SOUTH AFRICA WILL CONTINUE TO FAIL ... TO THE POINT OF COMPLETE
DISASTER!
______________________________________________________________When in doubt, just tell the truth. Mark Twain.
* Paul Mashitile, appeared on E-TV, as spokesman for the Social Cohesion Conference, and stated that it was a solemn objective of the Conference to "bring the races together, and ensure that people stop seeing themselves as whites, blacks, coloureds ... etc... "
It is quite difficult to imagine a more ludicrous objective in the light of the reality that government has defined the people as colours.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order --- theother.orgfree.com.
Order --- theother.orgfree.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment